Themabewertung:
  • 2 Bewertung(en) - 4 im Durchschnitt
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
15 Jahre 9/11
#31
(10.09.2016, 15:48)Kuddel™ schrieb: Daniel Neun listet eine Reihe von "Verfehlungen" amerikanischer Militärs auf und verweist auf die zahlreichen "Neulinge" an den entsprechenden Schaltstellen!
https://www.radio-utopie.de/2014/09/13/d...rsprueche/

Kannst du den Link bitte überprüfen?
Antworten
#32
(10.09.2016, 18:20)Blaubär schrieb:
(10.09.2016, 15:48)Kuddel™ schrieb: Daniel Neun listet eine Reihe von "Verfehlungen" amerikanischer Militärs auf und verweist auf die zahlreichen "Neulinge" an den entsprechenden Schaltstellen!
https://www.radio-utopie.de/2014/09/13/d...rsprueche/

Kannst du den Link bitte überprüfen?

Linkadresse kopieren und in ein neues Browserfenster einfügen, dann klappts auch mit dem Nachbarn Wink
                                                        
„Es gibt eine Form der Elitenverwahrlosung, die ist systemrelevant.“ (Gabor Steingart)
Antworten
#33
Stimmen:
Die Wahrheit über 9/11


Eric Margolis
 
„Amerikas strategische und wirtschaftliche Interessen im Mittleren Osten und in der muslimischen Welt werden gefährdet durch die Agonie in Palästina, welche unweigerlich zu terroristischen Attacken gegen Bürger und Eigentum der Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika einlädt.“ – Eric Margolis in Sun Media am 2. September 2001 (neun Tage vor den Attacken des 9/11 gegen New York und Washington DC.)
 
Während die Amerikaner den 15. Jahrestag der Attacken des 9/11 gegen ihr Land begehen, haben sie immer noch nicht die wahre Ursache dieser furchtbaren Angriffe begriffen.
Wer kann ihnen das vorwerfen? Unsere Politiker und Medien haben die Wahrheit hinter diesen und weiteren Attacken, die wir als ‚Terrorismus’ bezeichnen, total vernebelt. Während wir 9/11 betrauern, lassen schwere B-52 Bombenflugzeuge der Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika Bomben aud das hinunterhageln, was von Afghanistan noch übrig ist, in einem vergeblichen Versuch, den Kampf der einheimischen Kräfte (bekannt als Taliban) gegen die Besetzung ihres Landes durch den Westen zu zerschmettern.
Wir machten dasselbe in Laos in den 1980er Jahren, wie Präsident Obama richtig während seines Besuchs dort in der vergangenen Woche sagte. Laos hat sich niemals davon erholt, und Afghanistan wird sich auch nicht erholen. 
Seit 2015 haben die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika mindestens 32.000 500-1.000 kg Bomben auf den Irak, Syrien, Libyen, den Jemen, Somalia, Pakistan und Afghanistan abgeworfen – alles muslimische Länder. Die Bombenvorräte der Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika stehen kritisch tief, während die Waffenproduzenten Überstunden machen.
9/11 war eine Racheattacke, durchgeführt von hauptsächlich saudischen Bürgern, die behaupteten, die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika bestrafen zu wollen für die Unterstützung der Unterdrückung Palästinas durch Israel, und für die, wie sie sagten, ‚Okkupation’ Saudiarabiens durch die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika.
Das ist alles, was wir wirklich wissen. Wir haben nie die volle Geschichte des 9/11 mitbekommen. Das Beste was wir machen können, ist zu fragen „cui bono?“ - wer hat wirklich von den Attacken profitiert?
Das 9/11-Narrativ wurde von Präsident George Bush sofort verdreht in eine falsche Behauptung, dass Amerika wegen seiner „Freiheiten“ und seiner „Lebensart“ von Moslems angegriffen wurde. Das öffnete die Büchse der Pandora, aus der sich dann eine ansteigende Welle der Islamophobie und des Kreuzzugsfiebers über die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika und Europa ergoss.
Amerika wurde für das angegriffen, was es in der gesamten muslimischen Welt angerichtet hat, nicht für das, was es war. Die meisten Amerikaner wissen nicht, dass der erste „Regimewechsel“ der CIA im Mittleren Osten 1948 in Syrien erfolgte. Heute sind wir noch immer dabei.
Die ganze Zeit seitdem haben die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika, das Vereinigte Königreich und Frankreich – die imperialen drei Musketiere – Regimes im Mittleren Osten und in Afrika zerbrochen und eingerichtet, und schlimme Diktatoren installiert, die in unserem Auftrag handelten, was Feinde von Westafrika bis nach Tadschikistan einbrachte.
Hillary Clinton sagte diese Woche, dass sie, falls sie zur Präsidentin gewählt wird, den “amerikanischen Exzeptionalismus” vorantreiben und die neue Weltordnung sicherstellen werde. Das sind die Codebegriffe für Imperialismus und Hegemonie. Wenn Clinton gewinnt, dann machen Sie sich auf eine Außen- und Militärpolitik gefasst, die von Goldman Sachs und den Neokonservativen geleitet wird.
Donald Trump verspricht einen größeren Zuwachs bei den Militärausgaben in einer Zeit, in der Amerikas Infrastruktur dahinrostet oder zusammenbricht und seine Schulden rapide steigen. Beide, Trump und Clinton, warnen vor steigenden Sicherheitsbedrohungen durch ISIS und Nordkorea. In Wirklichkeit ist die größte Gefährdung der inneren Sicherheit die Art von Saturday Night Bandenschießereien in Chicago, bei denen heuer bereits 500 Menschen getötet worden sind.
ISIS ist ein militärischer Winzling – ein Haufen von etwa 20 Hooligans. Nordkorea will nur in Ruhe gelassen werden in seinem Elend. Washington, Paris und London benötigen heute den Schwarzen Mann ISIS nicht anders, als sie früher al-Qaeda und die Sowjetunion benötigten, um budgetsprengende Ausgaben für neue Waffen zu rechtfertigen und die Bevölkerung mit falschem Kriegsfieber aufgepeitscht zu halten.
International gesehen bildet die größte Gefahr für Amerikas Sicherheit natürlich das atomar bewaffnete Russland, das über genügend Interkontinental- und von See abgeschossene Raketen verfügt, um die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika von der Landkarte zu fegen. Dem entsprechend besteht Washingtons wichtigste Priorität in der Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik darin, ruhige wohlgeartete Beziehungen mit Russland und seiner Führung zu unterhalten.
Stattdessen haben wir Hillary Clinton und ihre fanatischen Neokonservativen von der Kriegspartei, die versuchen, Russland wann immer nur möglich zu provozieren und Moskau den Eindruck vermitteln, dass sie einen Krieg mit Russland beginnen wird. Es war genau diese Art von Kriegssprech und Säbelrasseln, die die Vereinigten Staaten von Amerika und die Sowjetunion 1983 in der Able Archer-Krise in Minutennähe eines ausgewachsenen Atomkriegs brachte.
Ungeachtet Trumps Gepolter und Islamophobie hat er absolut recht damit, gute Beziehungen mit Moskau zu suchen. Die schulhofmäßige Dämonisierung des russischen Präsidenten Vladimir Putin durch das Clinton-Lager und dessen gezähmte US-Medien ist kindisch, beschämend und einer großen Macht nicht wert.


 
 
erschienen am 10. September 2016 auf > www.ericmargolis.com
 
Antworten
#34
JFK and 9/11, The Tide is Turning? The “Official Story” Is Now “The Conspiracy Theory”link

[Bild: conspiracy.jpg]

In a few days it will be the 15th anniversary of 9/11, and this November 22 will be the 53rd anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy in Dallas, Texas. These two state crimes against democracy destroyed American democracy, accountable government, and the Constitution’s protections of civil liberty.
Years after the damage done by these events the American people no longer believe the official stories. Neither does the government, but the government will never validate the distrust that Americans now share of the oligarchs’ government by acknowledging the truth.
The official explanation of the assassination of President Kennedy never made any sense. Videos of the assassination contradicted the official story, as did witnesses, and many credible people challenged the government’s story. The CIA was faced with the official explanation becoming unglued and launched its media program stigmatizing doubters as “conspiracy theorists.”
The CIA’s psych warfare against the public succeeded at the time and for a number of years during which witnesses had mysterious deaths and the trail grew cold. But by the late 1970s there was so much public skepticism of the official story that the US Congress took the risk of being labeled “conspiracy kooks.” The House Select Committee on Assassinations reopened the inquiry into JFK’s murder. The House Committee concluded that the Warren Commission’s investigation was seriously flawed, that there was more than one person firing at President Kennedy and that there was a conspiracy to assassinate JFK.

The corrupt US Department of Justice (sic) contradicted the House Select Committee’s report. However, the American people believed the Select Committee and not the corrupt Justice (sic) Department, which never tells the truth about anything.
By 2013 polls showed that most Americans are “conspiracy kooks” who do not believe the official government line on JFK’s assassination. So with regard to JFK’s assassination, the “conspiracy theorists” are in the majority. The minority are the Americans who cannot escape their brainwashing.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post...d-kennedy/
In a few days it will be the 15th anniversary of the alleged al Qaeda attack on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, and we are witnessing the fading protection that the charge of “conspiracy theorist” provides for the officlal government story. Indeed, the official 9/11 story is collapsing before our eyes.
Europhysics, the respected publicaton of the European physics community has pubished an article by scientists who conclude that
“the evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three [World Trade Center] buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition.”
Few American scientists can admit this, because their careers depend on US government and military/security complex research contracts. Independent scientists in the US are a vanishing breed, an endangered species.
The scientists say that in view of their findings, “it is morally imperative” that 9/11 “be the subject of a truly scientific and impartial investigation by responsible authorities.”
http://www.europhysicsnews.org/articles/...6-47-4.pdf
So now we are faced with a peculiar situation. The scientifically ignorant two-bit punk American presstitutes claim to know more than the editors of the journal of the European physics community and the scientists who did the investigation. Don’t you think it farfetched that ignorant, corrupt, and cowardly American journalists who lie for money know more than physicists, chemists, 2,700 high-rise architects and structural engineers who have called on the US Congress to launch a real investigation of 9/11, firefighters and first responders who were on the WTC scene, military and civilian pilots and former high government officials, all of whom are on record challenging the unbelievable and physically impossible official story of 9/11? What kind of a moron does a person have to be to believe that the United States government and its media know better than the laws of physics?
The ability of the presstitutes to influence Americans seems to be on the decline. The media ganged up on Donald Trump during the Republican primaries, intending to deny Trump the nomination. But the voters ignored the presstitutes. In the current presidential campaign, Hillary is not the run-away winner that the presstitutes are trying to make her. And despite the propaganda ministry, the legs under the official 9/11 story are wobbly, to say the least.
Indeed, the official 9/11 story already has lost credibility with the American public. Last April a Rasmussen Poll found that “Americans doubt they’ve been told all the facts about the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States and strongly believe the government should come clean.”
A YouGov poll in 2013 found that 50 percent of Americans “have doubts about the government’s account of 9/11,” which shows that the public is far more intelligent and less corrupt than the presstitutes who are paid to lie to the public. This poll also found that as a consequence of the cover-up job performed by the American presstitutes, 46 percent of Americans were not even aware that a third WTC building, Building 7, collapsed on September 11. After viewing films of WTC 7’s collapse, 46 percent saw it as a controlled demolition. By a margin of two to one, poll respondants support a new investigation of Building 7’s collapse.
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_c...about_9_11
So, in America today “conspiracy kooks” outnumber those who believe the official lies. As the official lies are themselves conspiracy theories, Americans who disbelieve the official conspiracy theories outnumber Americans who believe official conspiracy theories. The question is: who are the real conspiracy kooks, the majority who disbelieve the official lies or the minority who believe the official lies?
It is curious that the CIA’s psych-op mind-control has broken down in the cases of the JFK assassination and 9/11, but is still effective in more recently orchestrated events, such as San Bernardino, Orlando, Paris, and Nice. Perhaps this is because not enough time has passed for the public to pay attention to the vast difference between the stories and the evidence.
The Internet offers many refutations of the official accounts. With regard to Nice, France, the Nice police officials themselves are having problems with the official story. The French Anti-Terrorist Sub-Directorate in Paris has ordered the public authorities in Nice to delete the video recordings from security cameras of the “Nice Terror Truck Attack.” The Nice authorities refused on the grounds that this would be destruction of criminal evidence. This story has disappeared from the news. I have asked friends in France how this conflict was resolved and have not heard anything. The French like to live life well and faced with the refugees from Washington’s wars, they seem to be focused on living life well while it can be done. If I hear anything, I will pass it on.
http://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2016/07/...rts/print/
Apparently, the order to delete the video evidence of the “attack” was not sufficient for the French Ministry of the Interior. According to a senior Nice police officer, Sandra Bertin, the Interior Ministry pressured her to falsify her police report on the Nice “truck massacre.” Officer Bertin told the Journal du Dimanche that “he ordered me to put in [the report] the specific positions of the national police which I had not seen on the screen.”
http://www.presstv.com/Detail/2016/07/25...assed-CCTV
The Interior Minister, Bernard Cazeneuve is suing the Nice police official for “defamation,” as if it is possible to defame any politician anywhere in the corrupt West.
http://www.newsweek.com/french-interior-minister-bernard-cazeneuve-sue-police-officer-over-nice-attack-483595 
Moreover, why would a senior Nice official make up a story about being ordered to change a report? It doesn’t make any sense, does it? Clearly, the central government is trying to hide the evidence against the official story.
http://www.presstv.com/Detail/2016/07/25...assed-CCTV
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2016/07/24/...yment.html
It seems that the French media is disposing of the Nice police official by branding her a rightwing racist opposed to the current government.
http://www.france24.com/en/20160725-fren...llegations
Watch this video and ignore the narrator’s four-letter vocabulary. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytM-cYfLxzk What you will learn is that all those people you saw running in the presstitute TV reports had no idea why they were running. The presstitutes created the impression that they were running away from the truck. However, as the interviews show, they were running because other people were running, because the police told them “terrorists, run,” and because they heard shots (apparently police firing blanks). Those interviewed reported, “You run with them even though you have no idea what you are running from. You can’t help it, you run with them.” None of those running away ever saw a truck.
According to the foul-mouthed narrator, the film of the people running away was taken prior to the time the truck allegedly mowed down 185 people, killing 85 of them. The narrator appears to be correct if the time stamps on videos are correct. The narrator says the streets needed to be cleared for the crisis actors to put on their show that is used to control our minds about what happened.
I have pointed out that a truck that hit 185 people, killing 85 of them would be covered in blood and that bodies would be splattered all over the street with blood everywhere. Yet, the photos and videos that we are shown show no such evidence. The stopped truck on which police are directing gunfire is as white as snow.
Independently of the vast analysis online of the video evidence of the alleged “Nice attack,” I suspect the Nice “terror attack” for the same reason that the Pentagon attack is suspect. Despite all the contrary evidence against the official stories, the authorities refuse to release the video evidence that, if it shows what the authorities claim, would shut up the skeptics and prove the official story.
When a government claims it has video evidence that proves its official story but refuses to release it, indeed, demands the destruction of the video evidence, we know for an absolute fact that the video evidence totally contradicts the official story. That is the only possible conclusion.
My readers will write to me asking how the government expects to get away with its faked, and in the case of 9/11 false flag, terror orchestrations? The answer, perhaps, is that just as it took a long time for the JFK assassination and 9/11 lies to catch up with the government, the recent orchestrations will also take some time for a slowly awakening public to catch on. In the meantime the orchestrated events will serve the agendas that they are intended to serve, and by the time that the public sees through the orchestrations, a new situation will be in place with new orchestrations.
Keep in mind that the public thinks it is shown evidence. Newspapers need photos to give a visual dimension to their coverage, and TV needs videos of the events. News organizations are under a time pressure, and they have to use what they are handed or what is at hand. There is no time to scrutinize the visual material or to raise questions about it. Most of the public thinks that the photos and videos shown to them are evidence or would not be shown and accepts the visual evidence without question. In an earlier column I linked to the vast array of Nice photos provided in the UK Daily Mail. The photos show a calm situation. There are a few people lying in the street without any sign of bodily damage or blood and there are covered objects that the public assumes are dead people.
But the streets are devoid of the splattered blood and mangled bodies that would be the consequence of a truck hitting 185 people. Similarly, we have been shown very few videos and their origin is unknown except for the one attributed to Richard Gutjahr who was apparently pre-positioned to film inconclusively both the Nice and German “terror attacks.” Online analysis of the videos shows that the videos are not evidence for the storyline. The real question is why the French Interior Minister has prevented the release and demanded destruction of the security camera videos that filmed the entire event, an order that brought the central government in Paris in conflict with the public authorities in Nice. There has been no US media interest whatsoever in this very strange event. It is not a “conspiracy theory” to ask why the public cannot see the video evidence that shows what actually happened.
What agenda is served by the Paris and Nice attacks? This is the question everyone should be asking and the media, if we had one, should be investigating. With the information currently available to me, my answer is this. Of all the peoples of Western Europe, the French are the most independently minded. French independence has taken a number of recent hits from Washington:
The largest French bank was forced to hand over $9 billion to Washington for doing business with a country on Washington’s disapproval list.
Washington forced France to cancel a lucrative ship-building program for Russia, to the detriment of French companies and shipyard workers.
Washington has forced France into a diplomatic conflict with Russia that the French do not want and into a looming military conflict which the French want even less, as the conflict would mean the vaporization of France. As one Russian SS-18 can wipe out three-fourths of the state of New York, how many do you think it would take to wipe France off of the face of the Earth? Not even a handful.
Keep in mind that in 1966 President Charles de Gaulle pulled France out of NATO on the grounds that it was necessary to preserve French independence in world affairs. France did not again submit to Washington’s control until 2009 when Washington-owned Nicolas Sarkozy, put into the French presidency by Washington’s money, followed his orders and rejoined NATO.
The Paris and Nice orchestrated events serve to scare France back into Washington’s arms. Dreams of independence become nightmares when independence leaves the French people at the mercy of both terrorists and Russians. Washington, who owns Sarkozy, who is once again Washington’s candidate for president of France, intends to keep France in NATO.
The article in Europhysics pointing out the impossibility of the official 9/11 story could possibly lead to a rebirth of skepticism among Europeans. Only a skeptical media willing to investigate government storylines can bring a halt to the staged terror events that serve secret agendas.
Keep in mind that the US government has plentiful video evidence of the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon but refuses to release the evidence that it says support its story. Similarly, the French federal government has prohibited Nice authorities from releasing the security camera videos of the Nice truck attack and has ordered the video evidence destroyed. How can we believe governments that refuse to show us the hard evidence?

[i]Dr. Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. Roberts’ latest books are The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the WestHow America Was Lost, and The Neoconservative Threat to World Order. was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. Roberts’ latest books are The Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the WestHow America Was Lost, and The Neoconservative Threat to World Order.[/i]
The original source of this article is Paul Craig Roberts
 
Antworten
#35




Link zu 9/11 Vortrag von Dr. Danielle Ganser


Der blaue Bote
[Bild: cropped-earth_and_limb_m1199291564l_colo...mask_0.jpg]
stellt ein paar Links zum Thema zusammen.
9/11 – Informatives zum 11. September 2001
Antworten
#36
[Bild: 911-1.jpg?w=1280]

Die 9/11 Verschwörung – Jahrestag 15

Zitat:Am Morgen des 11. Septembers sollte ein Meeting, der Firma AON Cooperation, im 105. Stockwerk des Südturmes des World Trade Centers stattfinden. In letzter Minute wurde das Meeting auf einen anderen Standort verlegt. Die Information wurde zu spät mitgeteilt, so dass 11 von 12 Mitarbeitern zum Meeting im World Trade Center erschienen und bei den Anschlägen gestorben sind. Der einzige Überlebende ist der Managing Director der Firma, Jim Pierce, der Cousin des damaligen Präsidenten der USA, George W. Bush.

Die 9/11 Story

19 arabisch stämmige Männer haben es geschafft, mit Teppichmessern bewaffnet, 4 Flugzeuge zu entführen, um Terroranschläge zu verüben. Zwei der Flugzeuge haben sie in die Word Trade Center Türme geflogen, wodurch beide Türme im freien Fall eingestürzt sind. Ein anderes Flugzeug wurde ins Pentagon geflogen und eins ist bei Shanksville abgestürzt.
...
wer weiterlesen will ; Die 9/11 Verschwörung – Jahrestag 15
Antworten
#37
Auf MAI2.eu - dort mit den Links - gibt es noch etwas mehr zu Firmen, deren Mitarbeiter verbrannten, während die Chefs weitab waren:
Das Pearl Harbor des 21. Jahrhunderts
Massenmörder äußern sich zu ihren Planungen
So auch heute, 15 Jahre danach: "US-Botschafter Emerson: 9/11 hat Amerika verändert "Für meine Generation ist 9/11 das, was für die Generation meiner Eltern Pearl Harbor war", sagte US-Botschafter John B. Emerson im DLF.


Hier nochmals der Hinweis auf die Jersey Girls, einige Frauen von Opfern, z.B. von Ronald Breitweiser, einem Fan von Warren Buffett. Breitweiser arbeitete bei Fiduciary Trust und starb - während seine Chefn so wie so manche andere Ostküsten-Magnaten nach Offutt-Nebraska geflogen war. Ann Tatlock war dort MORGENS auf der Offutt AFB (!) zu einer Wohltätigkeitsgala eingeladen bei Warren Buffett, dem zweitreichsten Mann der Welt. Während Breitweiser brannte und zerquetscht wurde, warteten Tatlock und andere auf de Präsidenten, der sich an diesem Tag die Zeit nahm, auf seinem Rückflug von Sarasota nach Washington mal eben dort vorbeizuschauen. Und den Reichsten der US-Reichen die Sachlage zu erläutern. Den Rest übernahm dann - da Kissinger einen Aufschrei verursachte - Thomas Kean bzgl. der Klärung von 9/11. Der saß nicht nur im Aufsichtsrat von Fiduciary, sondern war auch auf derselben Uni wie Bush. So klein ist die Welt.
Nichts von alledem, was hier auf MAI detailliert erarbeitet wurde, wurde von den Spökenkieker-Idioten weiter verbreitet, wurde irgendwo diskutiert und weiter verfolgt.
So weit zum "Aufklärungswillen" der Explosions-Verschwörungs-Theoretiker.
"Der Weg der Tugend ist recht schmal. Und dennoch herrscht überhaupt kein Gedränge."
(Hermine Hauß, Großtante)
Antworten
#38
Da manche Links auf MAI: der deutschen Referenz zu 9/11 teilweise nicht mehr zugänglich sind, möchte ich diese hier soweit als
möglich restaurieren.



Antworten
#39
the day after -> Go shopping..



Antworten
#40
9/11 Suspects: The Dancing Israelis


 
Antworten


Gehe zu:


Benutzer, die gerade dieses Thema anschauen: 1 Gast/Gäste