Themabewertung:
  • 0 Bewertung(en) - 0 im Durchschnitt
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Are You A Mind-Controlled CIA Stooge?
#1
Are You A Mind-Controlled CIA Stooge?

Authored by Paul Craig Roberts,
Do you smirk when you hear someone question the official stories of Orlando, San Bernardino, Paris or Nice? Do you feel superior to 2,500 architects and engineers, to firefighters, commercial and military pilots, physicists and chemists, and former high government officials who have raised doubts about 9/11? If so, you reflect the profile of a mind-controlled CIA stooge.
The term “conspiracy theory” was invented and put into public discourse by the CIA in 1964 in order to discredit the many skeptics who challenged the Warren Commission’s conclusion that President John F. Kennedy was assassinated by a lone gunman named Lee Harvey Oswald, who himself was assassinated while in police custody before he could be questioned. The CIA used its friends in the media to launch a campaign to make suspicion of the Warren Commission report a target of ridicule and hostility. This campaign was “one of the most successful propaganda initiatives of all time.”
So writes political science professor Lance deHaven-Smith, who in his peer-reviewed book, Conspiracy Theory in America, published by the University of Texas Press, tells the story of how the CIA succeeded in creating in the public mind reflexive, automatic, stigmatization of those who challenge government explanations. This is an extremely important and readable book, one of those rare books with the power to break you out of The Matrix.
Professor deHaven-Smith is able to write this book because the original CIA Dispatch #1035-960, which sets out the CIA plot, was obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request. Apparently, the bureaucracy did not regard a document this old as being of any importance. The document is marked “Destroy when no longer needed,” but somehow wasn’t. CIA Dispatch #1035-960 is reproduced in the book.
The success that the CIA has had in stigmatizing skepticism of government explanations has made it difficult to investigate State Crimes Against Democracy (SCAD) such as 9/11. With the public mind programmed to ridicule “conspiracy kooks,” even in the case of suspicious events such as 9/11 the government can destroy evidence, ignore prescribed procedures, delay an investigation, and then form a political committee to put its imprimatur on the official story.
link
 
Antworten
#2
(03.09.2016, 12:30)Haifisch schrieb: Are You A Mind-Controlled CIA Stooge?

Authored by Paul Craig Roberts,
..
Professor deHaven-Smith is able to write this book because the original CIA Dispatch #1035-960, which sets out the CIA plot, was obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request. Apparently, the bureaucracy did not regard a document this old as being of any importance. The document is marked “Destroy when no longer needed,” but somehow wasn’t. CIA Dispatch #1035-960 is reproduced in the book.
[b]

link

Wink
Zitat:CIA Document 1035 - 960
Concerning Criticism of the Warren Report

PDFCIA Document 1035 - 960

"DESTROY WHEN NO LONGER NEEDED"


Big Grin
Antworten
#3
Zitate:

"Innuendo of such seriousness affects not only the individual concerned,
but also the whole reputation of the American government. Our
organization itself is directly involved: among other facts, we contributed
information to the investigation. Conspiracy theories have frequently
thrown suspicion on our organization, for example by falsely alleging that
Lee Harvey Oswald worked for us. The aim of this dispatch is to provide
material countering and discrediting the claims of the conspiracy theorists,
so as to inhibit the circulation of such claims in other countries."
-------------
"3. Action. We do not recommend that discussion of the assassination
question be initiated where it is not already taking place. Where discussion
is active [business] addresses are requested:
a. To discuss the publicity problem with [?] and friendly elite contacts
(especially politicians and editors), pointing out that the Warren
Commission made as thorough an investigation as humanly possible, that
the charges of the critics are without serious foundation, and that further
speculative discussion only plays into the hands of the opposition. Point
out also that parts of the conspiracy talk appear to be deliberately
generated by Communist propagandists. Urge them to use their influence
to discourage unfounded and irresponsible speculation.
b. To employ propaganda assets to [negate] and refute the attacks of the
critics
------------
"g. Such vague accusations as that "more than ten people have died
mysteriously" can always be explained in some natural way e.g.: the
individuals concerned have for the most part died of natural causes; the
Commission staff questioned 418 witnesses (the FBI interviewed far more
people, conduction 25,000 interviews and re interviews), and in such a
large group, a certain number of deaths are to be expected. (When Penn
Jones, one of the originators of the "ten mysterious deaths" line, appeared
on television, it emerged that two of the deaths on his list were from heart
attacks, one from cancer, one was from a head-on collision on a bridge,
and one occurred when a driver drifted into a bridge abutment.)"

Das Handbuch der Blender Angry

"Such vague accusations as that "more than ten people have died
mysteriously" can always be explained in some natural way"

sischer, sischer

"
No, it's not all fake terrorism, just most of it. Some of the deaths are, sadly, real. On the bright side, no deaths were recorded in Connecticut after Sandy Hook. Orlando hospitals are not billing for emergency services and no deaths recorded there either.The media is complicit, need to look at the state records for deaths, there weren't any.
Lone wolf? That's a patsy setup by one of the alphabet agencies - like the abortion clinic shooting where the police chased the suv and shot it up, only the suv's headlights on the suspect vehicle were flashing as well as the 4 way emergency flashers.... only police car headlights flash. Jus' sayin'.
Most terrorism IS false, one would have to be a conspiracy theorist to believe otherwise.
 
Antworten


Gehe zu:


Benutzer, die gerade dieses Thema anschauen: 1 Gast/Gäste