Kreuzreaktionen - Faktencheck

[Huxley]

Hier die Links zu meinem Video "Wie man sich KAPUTTKORRIGIERT":

Aktuelle Version CORRECTIV:
https://correctiv.org/faktencheck/medizi...50-prozent

Diffchecker:
https://www.diffchecker.com/4SzcpSTm

Leitlinie zur Schweineimpfung:
https://www.openagrar.de/servlets/MCRFil...-02-01.pdf
(an der Stelle die Suchfunktion nutzen und nach Corona suchen)

correctiv.org (https://correctiv.org/faktencheck/medizi...0-prozent/)
Coronavirus: Nein, aktuelle PCR-Tests haben keine Fehlerquote von 30 bis 50 Prozent Nein, aktuelle PCR-Tests haben keine Fehlerquote von 30 bis 50 Prozent
In mehreren Youtube-Videos wird behauptet, dass PCR-Tests zum Nachweis von Corona-Infektionen in 30 bis 50 Prozent der Fälle falsche Ergebnisse lieferten. Das ist falsch.

[A.Hauß]

https://correctiv.org/faktencheck/2020/0...ntaktdaten

Wenn ich das richtig lese, schreibt correctiv, dem Drosten-Test werde eklatant falsch positive Ergebnisse zugerechnet. Correctiv hat daraufhin investigativ herausgefunden, dass Drosten das schon in seiner Folge 16 verneint hat und auch jetzt verneint.
Frage: hat correctiv beim VW-Skandal auf den Vorwurf hin, es gebe da eine Motor-SW-Manipulation, die falsche Ergebnisse produziere, auch den VW-Vorstand befragt?
Ich liebe diese Ermittlungsarbeit. Mit deutscher Gründlichkeit. Als Nixon oder Clinton zu ihren Aktivitäten befragt wurden, haben sie bekanntlich gelogen. Ja da gab es auch noch kein correctiv! Wen die in die Mangel nehmen, der spuckt alles aus, und dann weiß man`s .

[Huxley]

Wolfgang Wodarg@wodarg4 Min.
Temporary carriage of #bovine_coronavirus and bovine respiratory syncytial virus by fomites and #human_nasal_mucosa after exposure to #infected_calves https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5778652/
Prof. #Exner should comment on this!

Temporary carriage of bovine coronavirus and bovine respiratory syncytial virus by fomites and human nasal mucosa after exposure to infected calves
Abstract
Background
In order to prevent spread of the endemic pathogens bovine coronavirus (BCoV) and bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV) between herds, knowledge of indirect transmission by personnel and fomites is fundamental. The aims of the study were to determine the duration of viral RNA carriage and the infectivity of viral particles on fomites and human nasal mucosa after exposure to BCoV and BRSV. During two animal infection experiments, swabs were collected from personnel (nasal mucosa) and their clothes, boots and equipment after contact with calves shedding either virus. Viral RNA was quantified by RT-qPCR or droplet digital RT-PCR (RT-ddPCR), and selected samples with high levels of viral RNA were tested by cell culture for infectivity.
Results
For BCoV, 46% (n = 80) of the swabs from human nasal mucosa collected 30 min after exposure were positive by RT-qPCR. After two, four and six hours, 15%, 5% and 0% of the swabs were positive, respectively. Infective virions were not detected in mucosal swabs (n = 2). A high viral RNA load was detected on 97% (n = 44) of the fomites 24 h after exposure, and infective virions were detected in two of three swabs. For BRSV, 35% (n = 26) of the human nasal mucosa swabs collected 30 min after exposure, were positive by RT-ddPCR, but none were positive for infective virions. Of the fomites, 89% (n = 38) were positive for BRSV RNA 24 h after exposure, but all were negative for infective viruses.
Conclusions
The results indicate that human nasal mucosa can carry both BCoV and BRSV RNA after exposure to virus shedding calves, but the carriage seems short-lived and the transmission potential is likely limited. High viral loads on contaminates fomites 24 h after exposure to infected animals, and detection of infective BCoV, indicate that contaminated fomites represent a significant risk for indirect transmission between herds.

mehrhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5778652/