Themabewertung:
  • 0 Bewertung(en) - 0 im Durchschnitt
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ursprung des Virus und Chronologien
#1
17. März 2020 um 10:54
 
„Inzwischen ist nachgewiesen, dass das Virus gar nicht aus China kommt, sondern dort aus einem anderen Land eingeschleppt wurde. Diese These wird auch dadurch gestützt, dass die Genom-Varianten des Virus aus dem Iran und Italien sequenziert wurden und sich dabei herausstellte, dass diese in keiner Weise der Variante entsprechen, die China infizierte. Das bedeutet zwingend, dass es an anderer Stelle entstanden sein muss.“
„Offenbar kommt als einzig möglicher Ursprungsort nur die USA in Frage, denn das Land weist als einziges den »Baum« auf, von dem all die »Äste« abzweigen, also das Ursprungsvirus, aus dem sich die Varianten entwickelt haben. Insofern könnte es auch zutreffen, dass die ursprüngliche Quelle des Coronavirus 2019-nCoV das Biowaffenlabor des US-Militärs in Fort Detrick war.“
„Angesichts der Tatsache, dass die CDC Fort Detrick komplett gesperrt hat, wäre das nicht überraschend, aber nicht nur das: In einem früheren Artikel hatte ich bereits geschildert, dass es in den USA zwischen 2005 und 2012 insgesamt 1.059 Fälle gab, bei denen in den 10 Jahren zuvor Krankheitserreger entweder aus amerikanischen Biolaboren gestohlen wurden oder dort ausgetreten sind. Wir sprechen im Schnitt also über einen Fall alle 3 Tage.“
https://www.naturstoff-medizin.de/artike...sa-stammt/
Von Larry Romanoff (engl. Original auf Global Research).
Auch sonst lesenswert, trotz widersprüchlicher oder ungenauer Ausdrucksweise (z.B. am Anfang meines Zitats: entweder ist etwas „nachgewiesen“ oder es ist eine „These“). Aber egal, informativ über die US-Biowaffen ist es trotzdem).
 
Antworten
#2
Aktuelle Lage - hat NWO gewonnen oder verloren?



 
Antworten
#3
Visualizing The Secret History Of A Coronavirus Bioweapon
The below visualization The Secret History of Coronavirus Bioweapon is based on GreatGameIndia‘s exclusive report Coronavirus Bioweapon – How China Stole Coronavirus From Canada And Weaponized It
 
Antworten
#4
Engineered bat virus stirs debate over risky research
Lab-made coronavirus related to SARS can infect human cells.

Editors’ note, March 2020: We are aware that this story is being used as the basis for unverified theories that the novel coronavirus causing COVID-19 was engineered. There is no evidence that this is true; scientists believe that an animal is the most likely source of the coronavirus.

https://www.nature.com/news/engineered-b...ch-1.18787
Antworten
#5
Was Coronavirus a Biowarfare Attack Against China?

[The following is the republication of several long and very detailed comments by an unidentified purported expert on biowarfare that originally appeared on a recent thread of the Saker blogsite.]
I’ll throw my 2 cents in here. I have zero proof other than my gut feeling that this is a bioweapon. I do have 40 year of biodefense research experience behind me and worked at Fort Detrich on bacterial vaccines where I developed my own aerosol infection routes and developed multi-species models of pathogenesis to establish correlates of immunity. Because I was a one-stop shop doing everything including animal care, aerosol exposures, sample analysis, necropsy, and histopathology, etc. plus I had research programs in endemic areas studying the immunopathological response in human populations to establish immune correlates of protection for candidate vaccines all for the Biological Defense Research Program (BDRP).
I recall the early years when the Department of Homeland Security was stood up and they got the lion’s share of poorly performing ciivil servants un-fireable under the then OPMA policies. I was brought in as a technical expert as we were in dire straits for funding so I (and others) was lent out as a research prostitute. This is a little known problem with civil service employees. They are impossible to eliminate and generally rise to levels where they can cause the most damage. However, an opportunity arose whereby agencies in the Federal government had to contribute bodies to the new Department of Homeland Security (as no new vacancies were created when the agency was stood up meaning everyone had to sacrifice personnel) so most, if not all, employees sent to DHS were the worst of the worst. However, the DHS labs (specifically NBACC) also tied into some nefarious microbiologists working at the CIA (ostensibly part of DHS) and it is an understatement to say that what I saw being proposed horrified me. That work, I am certain was performed at Battle Memorial Institute in West Jefferson, Ohio under a DHS contract doing the work for the CIA under the auspices of NBACC. As I was very vocally opposed to this stuff I was removed from the secure access at DHS but not DoD to the offensive work which I had pointed out was not only illegal but unethical. I have since retired now more than 10 years and am far away from all of that. I won’t say more as they will reach out and seek retribution. But, if you look hard enough you can find still on the internet some references. There are some pissed off people out there should anyone care to actually do some leg work and try and figure this out. But, our news people no longer does this work so there is very little possibility of ever learning the truth.
However, that said, I notice some interesting things with COVID-19, that perked my ears up a bit. Yes, it could be a natural infection jumping species from bats to humans with a probable intermediate host, under conditions of human encroachment into world habitats. It is actually most likely to have been that, except for the strain differences being observed. That leads one to believe if it is in fact true, and I have no reason to doubt the Chinese on this, that it originated outside of China and it seems likely to have originated in the US. If, in fact, the US has 5 strains currently and China only one then it must have been percolating in the US for some time before it arose in China. Likely, deaths in the US were attributed to other diseases such as influenza and only retrospective sampling will determine this. It would be interesting to do a combination GPS-Molecular biology tracking of strains over time and distance. Also, a definite genetic analysis of strains over time would also be beneficial and can be done easily on every isolated strain. This would have value in attributing the course of the disease over time as part of a natural history study of the virus. We would need access to all samples of every lung disease related death for the past 12 months to be certain to track all potential deaths. NBACC is the key to figuring out what nefarious stuff was being funded.
It is possible that this virus has mutated over time to become more virulent. In particular engineered strains are generally unstable over multiple passages through multiple hosts. In my experience when testing strains for pathogenesis and lethality it is wise to first passage a frozen isolate several times through a susceptible animal host to regain full strength. If you test a lab isolate (usually frozen or lyophilized) generally it is wimpy unless you passage it at least 3 passages through an animal model. The worst strains are always those recovered from humans who died from the disease and not field collected strains. If this was perceived to be a useful agent from the likes of Bolton or Pompeo, who are terrible and evil people, then it is conceivable this was thought to teach the Chinese a lesson in economics. You have to be a complete idiot to release a virus for which you have no effective countermeasures but this administration seems to be filled with complete idiots. So, expecting normal behavior from these people is futile.
It could have been released during the 7th CISM military games held in Wuhan October 18-27, 2019 and that fits perfectly into the time scale for the actual infections. Now interestingly enough, I was a participant in several CISM competitions in Europe for skiing (I was on active duty for 26 years) so I am very well versed in who these athletes are. In general the best are Olympic competitors who are ostensibly part of the National Guard of their states who pay for their training by extended military active duty periods where their sole job is sports training. I used to lose every year to one of these guys and generally I placed a distant second place in cross country skiing. I also participated in the biathlon competitions and our soldiers were the very top level because they were in fact Olympic athletes. Rumor is that the US participants at CISM were atrocious which is very atypical so one wonders who these “athletes” were. I am reminded of the US military mission in Brazil to help flood victims which coincidentally was the exact same time that all the power transmission stations in Venezuela were destroyed. So, again a hackle or 2 rise when I heard about that. However, it is the perfect opportunity to release a virus on a target population.
I will also like to add that not all biological warfare agents are lethal. In fact, the worst are non-lethal as it consumes vast amounts of resources in treatment and lost productivity. Deaths are actually cheaper. So, a high communicability, low lethality disease is perfect for ruining an economy. As Trump’s administration claims they are waging war against economic enemies (currently China heads the list) using all possible actions. This fits perfectly into that; however, it may end up destroying the American economy which would be ironic.
I believe the Chinese response was exactly what a country would do if they were attacked with a bioweapon which explains a lot of their actions. I do not believe it was an accidental release from the BSL-4 labs in Wuhan. In fact, this may have been an irresistible opportunity similar to the alleged Novichuk release just 8 k away from Porton Down laboratories (the UK Fort Detrich). Interestingly, the potential release from PDL was never put forward as a logical explanation. Anyway, it sticks me that the CIA seems to have developed a pattern over time. As long as I am pushing my gut feelings I will throw out there the potential for a bioengineered adenovirus with c-fos and c-jun over expression which would cause sarcomas. That work was all published at the National Cancer Institute located where? Fort Detrich. I am certain it is just a coincidence. I can imagine the cackling going on at the CIA when planning this operation and again the coronavirus operation(s). I believe there were at least two attacks with Iran being the second and perhaps North Korea as well. However, evidence against it being a bioweapon is Russia, Venezuela, and Cuba are minimally affected. This could mean effective countermeasures or botched attacks. It is inconsistent though with the way the CIA operates.
Adenovirus is another virus similar to coronavirus in usage and easily aerosolized. I have made my own for over expression of medical treatments for wound infections. Has anyone other than myself noted that so many enemies of the US have died from sarcomas particularly in South America? My point is perhaps this stuff has been ongoing for quite some time and with some fairly good results. So, familiarity breeds contempt so as they gin more experience and begin to think this is good stuff, it is not out of the realm of possibility that this is in fact a bioweapon. That Iran was hit so hard is another hackle rising. It is just simply too good (for the idiots in the US government) to be a coincidence.
So, we are left with some interesting problems about this virus. Where was patient zero in China. What will be the results if a natural history study is conducted correlating geolocation, strain identity, severity of disease over time? Will that work be prevented? If so, that is yet another reason to be suspicious. Will it continue to mutate and what will be the outcome of this? Lots of good stuff to examine here and it will keep a lot of people busy for years.
Maybe you can explain this:
“Coronavirus have not previously been known to cause severe disease in humans”.
This is excerpt from the patent issued to CDC, US government. Link:
https://patents.google.com/patent/US7220852B1/en
So the question for me is why should a harmless virus be patented by the US government and used for research in labs like US army research at Ft. Derick? That makes it military. Why is there then the SARS-CoV, and the latest COVID-19 which is SARS-CoV-2 ? The swineflu was likewise proven to be lab made at least in sources other than mainstream and WHO, the same was the case with Ebola, and even HIV.
It immediately raises the question of ban of biological weapons labs in my mind, by internatiopnal treaties just like a ban on the use of napalm, landmines and so on, since a harmless virus are researched in army labs and suddenly appears as aggresive viruses .
It is an interesting question. Under the bioweapons conference treaty no offensive work can legally be done and any signatory can demand an onsite inspection of facilities for verification at any time. To my knowledge that has never been demanded of the US. It has been done to Russia and China is not a signatory, nor is Israel or North Korea. We have been caught doing inappropriate biodefense research several times now but only because it became known and there were no consequences.
The slippery slope within DoD is to make a counter measure you have to try and look forwards and using intelligence based informatics to design offensive agents. In my opinion this is fallacious as we can’t make countermeasures against the normal 10 agents on the high threat list (since the program’s inception in 1942) other than anthrax and smallpox for which we have had effective vaccines for decades. Since 9/11 no new effective and/or safe vaccines have been been made for any of the rest of the agents on the list. This includes several far more likely biothreats like the plague, tularemia, glanders, brucella, Ebola, Marburg, etc. This was despite pouring billions into biodefense research most of which went to universities. When things cooled down the funding dried up as always. USAMRIID is currently shut down and may never re-open. But contracted services still go on and are funded using black money so not under the purview of Congress. So trying to make vaccines against biothreat agents that don’t exist seems ridiculous when the real threats, some of which the US has used in warfare, are still out there without effective preventatives. What happens is when you pour money into an area as happened after 9/11 all kinds of ridiculous stuff gets funded with very little oversight. The goal is to spend the money and no one really cares if any actual product is created. In fact, success means the demise of your program so the incentive is to drag it out for as long as funding is available. I had programs managed under DTRA funding that because I got new program managers as often as every 3 months had no clue or even any expertise in the matter and had zero idea of what we were doing. I got tired of doing a new dog and pony show each time I was assigned a new manager who usually was some very young recent PhD graduate with no experience at all. Often they were nebutistic appointments and daddy was a Congressman or Under Secretary.
The intelligence based decisions are as usual idiotic as is most intelligence coming out of the CIA and its affiliates. You get better intelligence reading PUBMED than you get out of any intelligence agencies. The microbiologists who work at the CIA and its contract companies were all military microbiologists who because they were essentially incompetent drifted over to the CIA. Then you have some IMHO ridiculous events. I recall when Ken Alibekov “defected” he spoonfed a bunch of made up BS which the CIA bought lock stock and barrel. I had working for me at the same time several former Soviet microbiologists (one of who was a senior researcher at Biopreparat) who were in fact the real deal and all told me he was a bullshit artist. One thing he peddled was a chimeric smallpox-Ebola and another a Ebola-anthrax. So the CIA immediately funded an effort to create chimeric viruses. To my knowledge these were unsuccessful however, the COVID-19 may be being caused by a chimeric virus. The only good reason to make a chimeric virus is to develop a attenuated strain for use as a vaccine. But, as often happens some attenuated mutants become more lethal as an unintended consequence. Another event was trying to force photo data from Iraq to prove they had an offensive bioweapons program. These guys had no clue what laboratory equipment was in actuality and had offered up a cooking truck with pots and pans etc. as proof. They were and I assume still are, idiots.
DoD programs are actually transparent and managed by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency. Less transparent are the foreign stuff being funded under the Nunn-Lugar Act which includes the debacle of the “white elephant” lab and its satellite labs in the Republic of Georgia. No one will ever look into any of this but likely will end up blaming Russia or China.
They tend to underestimate their adversaries. China has an offensive program and if they get convinced they were attacked then I believe something nasty will be coming soon to the US. But, China is not stupid and won’t release a biothreat agent they have no preventative or treatment for. I also had several Chinese scientists working for me and I respect them immensely.

https://www.unz.com/article/was-coronavi...nst-china/

A historical article of interest:
The US Used Biological Warfare Against Mainland China in the 1950s
https://www.anti-empire.com/us-used-horr...orean-war/

Was the 2020 Wuhan Coronavirus an Engineered Biological Attack on China by America for Geopolitical Advantage?

Looking at the Military Aspects of Biological Warfare

Who Made Coronavirus? Was It the U.S., Israel or China Itself?

Bats, Gene Editing and Bioweapons: Recent Darpa Experiments Raise Concerns Amid Coronavirus Outbreak

Who or What Started the Wuhan Coronavirus Epidemic?
On the Condemnation of "Conspiracy Theories" as a Device for Protecting Officialdom’s Lies, Disinformation, and Obfuscation
 
Antworten
#6
Der grassierende Virus im Iran, Italien, Brasilien, … verleugnet seine Abstammung ….

… und will nichts mit jenem von Wuhan zu tun haben, .... sagen einige Wissenschaftler (darunter ein Taiwanese, Japaner, …)
Neither Iran nor Italy were included in the above tests, but both countries have now deciphered the locally prevalent genome and have declared them of different varieties from those in China, which means they did not originate in China but were of necessity introduced from another source. It is worth noting that the variety in Italy has approximately the same fatality rate as that of China, three times as great as other nations, while the haplotype in Iran appears to be the deadliest with a fatality rate of between 10% and 25%. (7) (8) (9)
https://www.globalresearch.ca/china-coro...te/5705196
Ein Update dazu:
https://www.globalresearch.ca/covid-19-f...us/5706078
Sie stützen sich dabei einerseits auf die Sequenzen der Genome, diese sollen nämlich keine Teile der Sorte enthalten, welche die Chinesen infizierte; andererseits auf den zeitlichen Ablauf, dann wäre der Wuhan-Fischmarkt als „Roter Hering“ geschuppt.
Indizien sollen zudem dafür sprechen, dass SARS-CoV-2 in den USA „geboren“ wurde, da NUR dieses Land den "Baumstamm" aller Sorten besitzt und sie verweisen dabei auf Fort Detrick.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/05/healt...azard.html
Der molekularbiologische Teil aus diesem Bericht, sollte für einige Virus-Experten hier auf Plausibilität nachprüfbar sein!
Dann gäbe es aber auch noch die Mutation! Aber in so kurzer Zeit? Hier berichtet einer aus Italien
https://www.rtp.pt/play/p6558/e458888/jornal-da-tarde (italienisch, ab Minute 12)
Die ersten Bayern-Fälle (Webasto), die man Kontakten zu Wuhan zuordnen kann, verliefen ja absolut mild. Ein Indiz für diese These?
Brasilien bestätigt ebenso zwei unterschiedliche Viren
https://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/en/saude/noticia/2020-03/coronavirus-cases-brazil-have...
Dazu berichten die "Qualitätsmedien" nichts oder etwas ganz anderes und für die hier
https://science.orf.at/stories/3200320/
ist Fort Detrick wohl etwas aus einem „Karl May Film“

https://www.dasgelbeforum.net/index.php?id=516440
 
Antworten
#7
bekir
März 17, 2020 
Die ganz stark vom Coronavirus betroffenen Länder China, Iran und Italien sind wichtige Brückenköpfe der Seidenstraßen-Initiative – ein Projekt, das den angelsächsichen Seemächten (siehe die alte und immer noch aktuelle „Herzlandtheorie“ von Halford Mackinder) ganz und gar nicht ins geostrategische Machtkalkül passt, weil sie deren Vorherrschaft über die Seewege der Welt bedeutungslos machen könnte.
Diese altbekannte Interessenlage hat vielerorts den Argwohn geweckt, die Corona-Geschichte könnte ein gezieltes Attentat der USA auf diese Seidenstraßen-Länder sein. Seit dem Abklingen der Pandemie in China werden von dort solche Vorwürfe lauter und aus dem eh von US-Sanktionen schwer gebeutelten Iran gab es sie sowieso von Anfang an.
Die US-freundliche „Süddeutsche“ spricht von „Verschwörungstheorien“ der iranischen Mächtigen, zeigt wenig Mitleid mit den leidenden Iranern und schon gar nicht Kritik an den menschenverachtenden US-Sanktionen,
https://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/coro...ket-newtab
Immerhin erfährt man aber dort vom Phänomen, dass von über 500 wegen des Coronavirus gestorbenen Iranern (Stand 15. März) erstaunlich viele der Machtelite angehören:
„Mehrere Mitglieder der Regierung und Berater von Staatsoberhaupt Ali Chamenei sind ERKRANKT“ – also nicht nur wie in anderen Regierungen bloß infiziert und mit schwachen Symptomen mal ein Weilchen in Quarantäne gegangen. Zudem sind „hohe Kommandeure der Revolutionsgarden Medien zufolge gestorben“.
Durchtrainierte (jedenfalls bestimmt nicht altersschwache) iranische Militärs werden nur so dahingerafft, während unser 64-jähriger Friedrich Merz nach frisch festgestellter Infektion mal eben zwei Wochen Auszeit nimmt, denn (wie meist in Deutschland, wenn man nicht gerade vorbelasteter Greis ist): „Zum Glück habe ich nur leichte bis mittlere Symptome.“
Da erinnert man sich auch wieder an die Horror-Nachrichten von Ende Januar aus China, wo angeblich Menschen auf offener Straße umfielen wie die Fiegen:
„women collapsing in streets / Videos show people ‚dropping like flies’“.
So berichtete (mit Links auf diese Videos) die International Business Times (eine große US-Online-Zeitung) damals – also zu einem Zeitpunkt, als China erst 850 Infizierte und sogar nur 26 Tote zählte, wie uns der gleiche Artikel verrät,
https://www.ibtimes.sg/china-virus-chill...=webuproar
Wie passt das zusammen? In vier bis sechs Wochen hat sich das Virus bestimmt nicht verändert und dass Chinesen und Iraner auf Corona so ganz anders reagieren als Deutsche, wurde bisher nie behauptet. Aber selbst wenn das mit den umfallenden Chinesen eine „Presse-Ente“ gewesen sein sollte: Die sehr frühe und extreme Alarmstimmung der chinesischen Mächtigen und ihr schnelles rigoroses Handeln waren unzweifelhaft echt, obwohl uns in Deutschland die ganze Virus-Geschichte maßlos übertrieben vorkommt.
Vielleicht meinen Chinesen und Iraner, wenn sie von „Biowaffen“ sprechen, genau das: Parallel zum (harmlosen) Corona-Virus gezielte Anschläge mit einer zusätzlichen, für die angegriffenen Völker noch nicht identifizierbaren „Substanz“?
Für Italien kann das natürlich keine Erklärung sein und auch für China und Iran ist ein Verdacht noch kein Beweis. Ohne Aufklärung der Merkwürdigkeiten werden Iraner und Chinesen sich aber nicht einfach mit der Rolle von Pechvögeln abfinden – hieraus könnte ein Zerwürfnis und ein Wunsch nach Rache entstehen, der das Coronavirus noch lange überdauert.
 
Antworten
#8
March 19, 2020

False Claims About The Novel Coronavirus And How To Debunk Them
Today China reported zero new domestic cases of novel coronavirus infections. It has beaten the epidemic just as we predicted early on. Other countries with still expanding epidemics will have to adopt all the measures China has taken to also win the fight.
Our extensive reporting about the novel cornonavirus has attracted many new commentators to this site. Unfortunately some of these, as well as some of the regulars, continue to spread disinformation and myths about the current pandemic and its causes.
To keep some level of quality at this site requires an aggressive countering of such comments. But our capacity to do so is limited. We do delete comments that are nonsensical or have been debunked and we do block people who insist to post or repost nonsense. But there are now many more comments per day than we can read. We therefore have to ask other commentators to counter the bad false ones.
Here are some of the false claims that are made about the pandemic and the facts needed to debunk them.
Myth:
The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 is a Chinese virus that comes from bats. It infected people because Chinese people eat bats.
Facts:
The source of the virus is actually not known. The patient number 1, the person who first carried the virus, has not been found. The Wuhan wet market where exotic animals are sold was not the source of the outbreak:
Cont. reading: False Claims About The Novel Coronavirus And How To Debunk Them
 
Antworten
#9
Controversa Puntata di TGR Leonardo RAI3 del 16.11.2015 #coronavirus hanno tentato di oscurarlo





Antworten
#10
Photo 
Теории о происхождении вируса:

[Bild: coronavirus-origin-theories-poster-vector-medium.png]

источник: 
https://creazilla.com/nodes/19974-corona...ter-vector
Antworten


Gehe zu:


Benutzer, die gerade dieses Thema anschauen: 1 Gast/Gäste