Corporate Media Refuse to Call the Bolivian Coup by Its Name
Army generals appearing on television to demand the resignation and arrest of an elected civilian head of state seems like a textbook example of a coup. And yet that is certainly not how corporate media are presenting the weekend’s events in Bolivia.
No establishment outlet framed the action as a coup; instead, President Evo Morales “resigned” (
ABC News,
11/10/19), amid widespread “protests” (
CBS News,
11/10/19) from an “infuriated population” (
New York Times,
11/10/19) angry at the “election fraud” (
Fox News,
11/10/19) of the “full-blown dictatorship” (
Miami Herald,
11/9/19). When the word “coup” is used at all, it comes only as an accusation from Morales or another official from his government, which corporate media have been demonizing since his election in 2006 (
FAIR.org,
5/6/09,
8/1/12,
4/11/19).
The
New York Times (
11/10/19) did not hide its approval at events, presenting Morales as a power-hungry despot who had finally “lost his grip on power,” claiming he was “besieged by protests” and “abandoned by allies” like the security services. His authoritarian tendencies, the news article claimed, “worried critics and many supporters for years,” and allowed one source to claim that his overthrow marked “the end of tyranny” for Bolivia. With an apparent nod to balance, it did note that Morales “admitted no wrongdoing” and claimed he was a “victim of a coup.” By that point, however, the well had been thoroughly poisoned.
CNN (
11/10/19) dismissed the results of the
recent election, where Bolivia gave Morales another term in office, as beset with “accusations of election fraud,” presenting them as a farce where “Morales declared himself the winner.”
Time’s report (
11/10/19) presented the catalyst for his “resignation” as “protests” and “fraud allegations,” rather than being forced at gunpoint by the military. Meanwhile,
CBS News (
11/10/19) did not even include the word “allegations,” its headline reading, “Bolivian President Evo Morales Resigns After Election Fraud and Protests.”
Delegitimizing foreign elections where the “wrong” person wins, of course, is a favorite pastime of corporate media (
FAIR.org,
5/23/18). There is a great deal of uncritical acceptance of the Organization of American States’ (OAS) opinions on elections, including in coverage of Bolivia’s October vote (e.g.,
BBC,
11/10/19;
Vox,
11/10/19;
Voice of America,
11/10/19), despite the lack of evidence to back up its assertions. No mainstream outlet warned its readers that the OAS is a Cold War organization, explicitly set up to halt the spread of leftist governments. In 1962, for example, it
passed an official resolution claiming that the Cuban government was “incompatible with the principles and objectives of the inter-American system.” Furthermore, the organization is bankrolled by the US government; indeed, in justifying its continued funding, US AID
argued that the OAS is a crucial tool in “promot[ing] US interests in the Western hemisphere.....
weiter >
https://www.truthdig.com/articles/corpor...-its-name/
![[Bild: bblackwater.jpg]](http://82.221.129.208/pages/bblackwater.jpg)
![[Bild: blackwaterskull.jpg]](http://82.221.129.208/pages/blackwaterskull.jpg)
![[Bild: heybro.jpg]](http://82.221.129.208/pages/heybro.jpg)