• 1 Bewertung(en) - 5 im Durchschnitt
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Clintons e-mailgate, DNC-Leaks
Hillary Clinton Email Archive

On March 16, 2016 WikiLeaks launched a searchable archive for 30,322 emails & email attachments sent to and from Hillary Clinton's private email server while she was Secretary of State. The 50,547 pages of documents span from 30 June 2010 to 12 August 2014. 7,570 of the documents were sent by Hillary Clinton. The emails were made available in the form of thousands of PDFs by the US State Department as a result of a Freedom of Information Act request. The final PDFs were made available on February 29, 2016.

Ein Kommentator hält das für einen "limited hangout" (wie so oft, siehe Snowdon)

ein anderer schreibt:

The State Department re-opened their email/server case against Killary Clingon after the grilling they received from Congress.
Don’t hold your breath…..
Hillary: ” I did not have email relations with that Server.”
It all depends on what you mean by is, is….
The Clinton Foundation?

By Michael Hudson,   Hudson is Distinguished Research Professor of Economics at the University of Missouri, Kansas City, who has advised the U.S., Canadian, Mexican and Latvian governments as well as the United Nations Institute for Training and Research. He is a former Wall Street economist at Chase Manhattan Bank, who also helped establish the world’s first sovereign debt fund.

Clinton email and Foundation TRNN July 8 2016.
“Is the Real Scandal the Clinton Foundation?,” TRNN, July 8, 2016.
Michael Hudson says the media has failed to look beyond the emails and into potential conflicts of interest during Hillary Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State.

On Thursday morning, the media fest and political fest around Hillary Clinton’s email scandal continued, as the head of the FBI, James Comey, spoke at a congressional House oversight committee. Here’s a little clip of what was said there. But let me just foreshadow–maybe the emails aren’t the real issue that should be in front of these hearings. Now, here’s the chairman of the House Oversight Committee, Jason Chaffetz, questioning James Comey and a bit of his answer.

JASON CHAFFETZ: It seems to a lot of us that the average Joe, the average American, that if they had done what you laid out in your statement, that they’d be in handcuffs. And I think there is a legitimate concern that there is a double standard. Your name isn’t Clinton, you’re not part of the powerful elite, that Lady Justice will act differently.

JAMES COMEY: I believe this investigation was conducted consistent with the highest traditions of the FBI. Our folks did it in an apolitical and professional way. There are two things that matter in a criminal investigation of a subject. And so when I look at the facts we gathered here–as I said, I see evidence of great carelessness. But I do not see evidence that is sufficient to establish that Secretary Clinton, or those with whom she was corresponding, both talked about classified information on email, and knew when they did it they were doing something that was against the law. So give that assessment of the facts and my understanding of the law, my conclusion was, and remains, no reasonable prosecutor would bring this case. No reasonable prosecutor would bring the second case in 100 years focused on gross negligence.
⇒ Keep Reading
SputnikNews: E-Mail-Affäre: US-Kongress will Clinton auf Meineid prüfen

Zitat:Zwei führende Ausschussvorsitzende des US-Repräsentantenhauses wollen vom Justizministerium untersuchen lassen, ob sich die demokratische Präsidentschaftsbewerberin Hillary Clinton vor dem Kongress des Meineids schuldig gemacht hat, wie die Agentur Reuters meldet.

Das entsprechende Schreiben mit der Forderung neuer Ermittlungen haben Jason Chaffetz, Vorsitzender des Komitees für Aufsicht und Staatliche Reform, und Bob Goodlatte, Vorsitzender des Komitees für juristische Angelegenheiten, unterzeichnet. Chaffetz forderte außerdem Zugang zu den FBI-Beweisen im Fall Clinton. Beide Unterzeichner stammen aus der Partei der Republikaner.

Die vom FBI gesammelten Beweise über Clintons Nutzung ihres privaten Mailservers für dienstliche E-Mails „scheinen mehreren Aspekten ihrer beeideten Aussage direkt zu widersprechen", schrieben die republikanischen Abgeordneten in einem Brief an die Staatsanwaltschaft.
Wenn so jemand US-Präsident wird, dann gute Nacht.

Immerhin fallen in ihre Amtszeit als Aussenministerin der gesamte arabische Frühling (Ägypten, Tunesien, Lybien, Syrien), die "Tötung" des Bin-Laden-Gespenstes und einiges mehr (jüngst:Forderungen nach neuen Sanktionen gegen den Iran, eine Flugverbotszone über Syrien, in der Ukraine-Krise setzt sie schon mal Putin mit Hitler gleich)

ob sich wieder 200.000 Naive finden, die die Präsidentin dann in Berlin bejubeln?

Am Ende ist es letztlich egal, wer da im November die Wahlen gewinnt, der Nationalist oder die Globalistin.

Want to Know Why America is Seemingly Losing Its Mind?

[Bild: emotional_masks.jpg]

America is going NUTS! Police abuse, abuse of police, race wars, politicians getting away with felonies. Why is it all happening? Have emotions trumped logic?

"Our society has many immature and ignorant members because they are easily manipulated. Schools are turning out uneducated kids that will continue to live in moms basement because they are not developed in being a responsible intelligent citizen.

Millennialis pride themselves as techno savvy but kids their age in the 1800s were running the family business. As intelligence departs, emotion and superstition grows.
Like Carlin said, those in control only want people just smart enough to run the machinery but dumb enough to accept their position. Evil has empowered stupid to destroy their own nation. An emotional and unintelligent person is easily controlled, especially with fear.
We have a nation of children who only know how to follow. This is why Facebook and Twitter are so big. The herd mentality!!!"

und so ist eben auch die Masse in Deutschland

(weinerlich, emotional, gehirngewaschen und möchte gern tolerant )
Am Ende ist es letztlich egal, wer da im November die Wahlen gewinnt, der Nationalist oder die Globalistin.

Genau, die Strippen werden eh im Hintergrund gezogen.
Was die Lügenpresse über Hillary Clinton gerne unter den Teppich kehrt

Glaubt man der Lügenpresse, dann sind George W. Bush, Barack Obama oder auch Hillary Clinton charmante und seriöse Demokraten und Humanisten, die die Welt verbessern wollen. Objektiv betrachtet handelt es sich um Verbrecher, die in den vergangenen Jahren mörderische Blutspuren durch die (vorwiegend islamische) Welt gezogen, Regierungen gestürzt, erpresst und destabilisiert haben, die foltern lassen und unbescholtene Bürger bespitzeln.

Abby Martin hat für telesur ein knapp 30 minütiges Dossier aus Fakten zusammengestellt, die man in der transatlantischen Propaganda bestenfalls dann in verstreuten Puzzleteilen findet, wenn man weiß, wonach man suchen muss. RT hat den Beitrag ins Deutsche übersetzt. Die Lügenpresse würde sowas Propaganda nennen. Wir nennen es Aufklärung und wissen einmal mehr, warum die Lügenpresse Lügenpresse heißt.

FBI Made Agents Sign Non-Disclosure Agreement Protecting Hillary Even More: “In an unusual move, FBI agents working the Hillary Clinton email case had to sign a special form reminding them not to blab about the probe to anyone unless called to testify.”
Hillary Clinton’s Email Absolution: Two Parties, One Criminal Regime
Hillary Clinton Emails TOO TOP SECRET for Congress to See – UNBELIEVABLE!!!
Jason Chaffetz, Chairman of the House asked if Congress could see certain emails in question. Charles McCullough, the Deputy Inspector General at ODNI testified that the emails were TOO TOP SECRET even for Congress to see. The Deputy Inspector General didn’t even have the security clearance to see those emails. He couldn’t even tell Congress the name of the agency that the emails came from. Hillary Clinton allowed someone without security clearance and in an unprotected format to see such highly sensitive emails.
New Hillary leak: Wikileaks releases 20K DNC emails
Nearly 20,000 emails and more than 8,000 attachments from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) have been released by WikiLeaks. Many of the emails indicate that top DNC officials were hostile to the Bernie Sanders campaign.

The emails released Friday cover a period from Janury 2015 to May 2016. They purportedly come from the accounts of seven major figures in the DNC: Senior Adviser Andrew Wright, National Finance Director Jordon Kaplan, Finance Chief of Staff Scott Comer, Communications Director Luis Miranda, Northern California Finance Director Robert Stowe, Finance Director of Data & Strategic Initiatives Daniel Parrish and Finance Director Allen Zachary.

Many of the emails regard Bernie Sanders and dealing with the fallout of many Democrats opposing Hillary Clinton and calling the system “rigged.” Many of the emails exchanged between top DNC officials are simply the text of news articles concerning how establishment democrats can “deal” with the insurgent left-winger.
Wikileaks releases 19252 DNC documents and Google now listing it as a dangerous site

Gehe zu:

Benutzer, die gerade dieses Thema anschauen: 1 Gast/Gäste