Themabewertung:
  • 0 Bewertung(en) - 0 im Durchschnitt
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Wikileaks-Veröffentlichungen/Leaks/Assange
CJ Hopkins: Assange & Uncle Tom's Empire

Authored (satirically) by CJ Hopkins via The Unz Review,

I don’t normally do this kind of thing, but, given the arrest of Julian Assange last week, and the awkward and cowardly responses thereto, I felt it necessary to abandon my customary literary standards and spew out a spineless, hypocritical “hot take” professing my concern about the dangerous precedent the U.S. government may be setting by extraditing and prosecuting a publisher for exposing American war crimes and such, while at the same time making it abundantly clear how much I personally loathe Assange, and consider him an enemy of America, and freedom, and want the authorities to crush him like a cockroach.

Now I want to be absolutely clear. I totally defend Assange and Wikileaks, and the principle of freedom of the press, and whatever. And I am all for exposing American war crimes (as long as it doesn’t endanger the lives of the Americans who committed those war crimes, or inconvenience them in any way). At the same time, while I totally support all that, I feel compelled to express my support together with my personal loathing of Assange, who, if all those important principles weren’t involved, I would want to see taken out and shot, or at least locked up in Super-Max solitary … not for any crime in particular, but just because I personally loathe him so much.
I’m not quite sure why I loathe Assange. I’ve never actually met the man. I just have this weird, amorphous feeling that he’s a horrible, disgusting, extremist person who is working for the Russians and is probably a Nazi. It feels kind of like that feeling I had, back in the Winter of 2003, that Saddam Hussein had nuclear weapons, which he was going to give to those Al Qaeda terrorists who were bayonetting little babies in their incubators, or the feeling I still have, despite all evidence to the contrary, that Trump is a Russian intelligence asset who peed on Barack Obama’s bed, and who is going to set fire to the Capitol building, declare himself American Hitler, and start rounding up and murdering the Jews.
I don’t know where these feelings come from. If you challenged me, I probably couldn’t really support them with any, like, actual facts or anything, at least not in any kind of rational way. Being an introspective sort of person, I do sometimes wonder if maybe my feelings are the result of all the propaganda and relentless psychological and emotional conditioning that the ruling classes and the corporate media have subjected me to since the day I was born, and that influential people in my social circle have repeated, over and over again, in such a manner as to make it clear that contradicting their views would be extremely unwelcome, and might negatively impact my social status, and my prospects for professional advancement.
Take my loathing of Assange, for example. I feel like I can’t even write a column condemning his arrest and extradition without gratuitously mocking or insulting the man. When I try to, I feel this sudden fear of being denounced as a “Trump-loving Putin-Nazi,” and a “Kremlin-sponsored rape apologist,” and unfriended by all my Facebook friends. Worse, I get this sickening feeling that unless I qualify my unqualified support for freedom of press, and transparency, and so on, with some sort of vicious, vindictive remark about the state of Assange’s body odor, and how he’s probably got cooties, or has pooped his pants, or some other childish and sadistic taunt, I can kiss any chance I might have had of getting published in a respectable publication goodbye.
But I’m probably just being paranoid, right? Distinguished, highbrow newspapers and magazines like The AtlanticThe GuardianThe Washington PostThe New York TimesVoxViceDaily Mail, and others of that caliber, are not just propaganda organs whose primary purpose is to reinforce the official narratives of the ruling classes. No, they publish a broad range of opposing views. The Guardian, for example, just got Owen Jones to write a full-throated defense of Assange on that grounds that he’s probably a Nazi rapist who should be locked up in a Swedish prison, not in an American prison! The Guardian, remember, is the same publication that printed a completely fabricated story accusing Assange of secretly meeting with Paul Manafort and some alleged “Russians,” among a deluge of other such Russiagate nonsense, and that has been demonizing Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-Semite for several years.
Plus, according to NPR’s Bob Garfield (who is lustfully “looking forward to Assange’s day in court”), and other liberal lexicologists, Julian Assange is not even a real journalist, so we have no choice but to mock and humiliate him, and accuse him of rape and espionage … oh, and speaking of which, did you hear the one about how his cat was spying on the Ecuadorean diplomats?
But seriously now, all joking aside, it’s always instructive (if a bit sickening) to watch as the mandarins of the corporate media disseminate an official narrative and millions of people robotically repeat it as if it were their own opinions. This process is particularly nauseating to watch when the narrative involves the stigmatization, delegitimization, and humiliation of an official enemy of the ruling classes. Typically, this enemy is a foreign enemy, like Saddam, Gaddafi, Assad, Milošević, Osama bin Laden, Putin, or whoever. But sometimes the enemy is one of “us” … a traitor, a Judas, a quisling, a snitch, like Trump, Corbyn, or Julian Assange.
In either case, the primary function of the corporate media remains the same: to relentlessly assassinate the character of the “enemy,” and to whip the masses up into a mindless frenzy of hatred of him, like the Two-Minutes Hate in 1984, the Kill-the-Pig scene in Lord of the Flies, the scapegoating of Jews in Nazi Germany, and other examples a bit closer to home.
Logic, facts, and actual evidence have little to nothing to do with this process......
 
Antworten
16. April 2019 um 06:46
Labour führt Hetzkampagne gegen Assange wegen angeblicher „Vergewaltigung“
Von Laura Tiernan
16. April 2019
https://www.wsws.org/de/articles/2019/04...s-a16.html
Zitat:
Die Parlamentsfraktion der Labour Party (PLP) stellt sich an die Spitze einer politischen Kampagne mit dem Ziel, WikiLeaks-Herausgeber Julian Assange als „Vergewaltiger“ darzustellen, der an Schweden ausgeliefert werden muss. Labour-Parteichef Jeremy Corbyn hat diese schmutzige Kampagne am Wochenende unterstützt.
Mehr als 100 Abgeordnete haben einen parteiübergreifenden Brief unterzeichnet, in dem Tory-Innenminister Sajid Javid und Labours Schatten-Innenministerin Diane Abbott aufgefordert werden, sich „dafür einzusetzen, dass Julian Assange an Schweden ausgeliefert werden kann“. In Schweden wurde 2010 eine politisch motivierte Anklage wegen Vergewaltigung und sexueller Belästigung gegen ihn konstruiert.
Der Brief wurde am Freitag von den blairistischen Abgeordneten Stella Creasy und Jess Phillips verfasst. Die meisten Unterzeichner sind Blair-Anhänger, doch unter ihnen befinden sich auch die unabhängigen Abgeordneten Chuka Umunna, Luciana Berger und Anna Soubry, Abgeordnete der Tories, Liberaldemokraten und der Scottish National Party sowie mehrere Labour-Oberhausabgeordnete.
 
Antworten
[ theCanary.co/uk ]
On Sky News, an inconvenient fact from Julian Assange’s lawyer collapses the official narrative

On 14 April, UK lawyer for Julian Assange, Jennifer Robinson, collapsed the official narrative on Sky News.
Speaking to Sophy Ridge, Robinson pointed out an inconvenient fact:
„All these people saying he was hiding from Swedish justice. If that were the case, why didn’t he walk out the embassy two years ago when this case was dropped?“
 
Antworten
Honest Government Ad | Julian Assange



 
Antworten
> Zahnlose Zuschauer
Medien, die die Strafverfolgung Julian Assanges kritiklos durchwinken, sägen an dem Ast, auf dem sie selbst sitzen.
 
Antworten
> Die Anklage gegen Assange ist abenteuerlich (Video)
Die US-Justiz wirft Julian Assange vor, als "Teil einer Verschwörung" seine Quelle verborgen zu haben. Nach Auffassung von Bürgerrechtlern ist dies allerdings in Wirklichkeit normales journalistisches Handwerk. Sie sehen die Pressefreiheit in Gefahr.....
 
Antworten


Gehe zu:


Benutzer, die gerade dieses Thema anschauen: 1 Gast/Gäste